OOC: To be or not to be?

"Man is free at the instant he wishes to be." - Voltaire

Moderator: Huojin

Post Reply
Huojin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3139
Joined: 07:30:29 Thursday, 02 August, 2012

OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Huojin » 18:15:39 Wednesday, 05 April, 2017

So things have been progressing... pretty slowly with Louisiana, it's safe to say. Aside from very early in its run, Louisiana has not had much pace and quickness to it - something largely made up for in its depth and detail and the roleplays and stories many of your have drawn from it (some more than others, of course).

But there were player slowness issues issues in the summer and autumn when I was free, and since we've been ready to roll onwards I've had my own time constraints ramp up significantly. Not to mention a handful of things that have taken far longer than they ought to have - the Peace of Frankfort, which many of you have been following, least among them.

Suffice to say we've been going through a prolonged slow period that is being felt particularly keenly at the moment. In fact it has been 8 months since the last turn. So this is a kind of... state-of-the-game/how do you all feel about it post? Some of you will have lost interest, others will be amongst the games chiefest fans and eager to see it continue. But I'd very much appreciate some frank and honest assessments (brutally so if need be) or comments on the game and what the players are thinking. Not least because I'm very aware that we've placed the burden of sole running game on Gesar alone.

So yes. Input and comments please!


As for my own position and thoughts, since they will invariably be referenced by people... This game has been a major work for me, something I have adored deeply and if and when I set it aside, I will inevitably feel a deep loss. The world it build has been tremendous fun and I will absolutely return to it, whatever happens. My primary problem with it at the moment has been sustaining my love and enthusiasm for such a long period of time, and over so many peaks and troughs of activity (whether GM or player caused). At the moment, I'm undoubtedly in a trough. I could pull out of it with enough enthusiasm and support for the game, but equally I might not. My opinion is therefore a little unhelpful, and I am thoroughly able of being swayed either way.

Please feel free to raise further questions if you think doing so may further illuminate how I feel about the game and whether I want to keep on going. Or not, whatever you all like.

User avatar
Serenissima
(Not) Molotov's Favourite Psychic Schoolgirl
Posts: 952
Joined: 23:49:08 Wednesday, 17 April, 2013
Location: United Kingdom

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Serenissima » 22:26:50 Wednesday, 05 April, 2017

I'm still hoping for some naval battles and things to happen like I signed up for, really. But all the same, all of the action has been at the conference, which I haven't been involved in. If the direction of the game and what's willing to be run is in the direction of just the conference roleplaying thread, that's all fine, but it might benefit from focusing on that rather than the war and Louisiana as a whole. But I'm happy to just continue my own thing, too - I just haven't always known if it was even something that was wanted in the game.
"Imagine lies, and then write them down in order. That is literally all authors do!"

Louisiana: Antoine d'Ailly, captain of Sorcière, commodore of the Marine de l'Assemblée
Metal Gear BoP: Japan
Saenwyn: Jace Kern, Duke of Tailledun
1968: French Fifth Republic
1800: Britain

User avatar
Gesar
Social Justice Stasi
Social Justice Stasi
Posts: 1148
Joined: 00:18:50 Thursday, 02 August, 2012

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Gesar » 02:35:01 Thursday, 06 April, 2017

On a personal level, I would like for Louisiana to continue. Seren did raise a good point (though I'd disagree, having a part in it, that the peace treaty was anything resembling the main action of the game- about involvement for players, however. Perhaps further investigation into that would help with motivation on all parts.
Saenwyn: A Song of Ashes: Storyteller

Louisiana 1792: Fils de la Révolution: Monsieur le Commissaire de l'Intérieur Thomas Francois Jérôme Cossard, Mayor of Saint-Louis and editor of L'Ami de la République
Liberty in Dark Waters: Leopold Karl von Stenhielm, Baron af Rödesund, Knight and Commander of the Orders of His Majesty the King, convicted traitor
Balance of Power 1968: Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, President and Baba wa Taifa of the United Republic of Tanzania
Smyg wrote:The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of Gesar coping with being a total fucking a-grade revolutionary thinker
SpoilerShow
#DraftGesar

User avatar
Serenissima
(Not) Molotov's Favourite Psychic Schoolgirl
Posts: 952
Joined: 23:49:08 Wednesday, 17 April, 2013
Location: United Kingdom

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Serenissima » 03:23:47 Thursday, 06 April, 2017

I should clarify I mean all of the action for a very long time, not the game overall.
"Imagine lies, and then write them down in order. That is literally all authors do!"

Louisiana: Antoine d'Ailly, captain of Sorcière, commodore of the Marine de l'Assemblée
Metal Gear BoP: Japan
Saenwyn: Jace Kern, Duke of Tailledun
1968: French Fifth Republic
1800: Britain

User avatar
Maddox
"Marche ou Crève"
Posts: 79
Joined: 01:46:33 Monday, 20 August, 2012
Location: The blasted Detroit-lands

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Maddox » 07:49:21 Thursday, 06 April, 2017

I want the game to continue because I haven't done anything yet.
Casimir Georges Vachon, Légion de Laffite - Louisiana
Prince Gustave Tremayne, Duke of Lathair, Margrave in the West, Count of Wynriver, Blood Royal
Ralf Persson, Axe Murderer - Dark Waters
Inquisitor Sun Thu Mai/Game Master - The Ironfall Disappearances
<Rinkou> Like, the only thing I listen to is the vibrations of the earth and Joe Rogan podcasts, man

User avatar
Luc
Romanov of Stats
Posts: 354
Joined: 10:37:42 Thursday, 11 August, 2016
Location: A meridie in regione Aequatoris

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Luc » 19:05:54 Thursday, 06 April, 2017

I would love for the game to continue as well.
"I am to BOP stats, what Nicholas II was to Russia." - El Luc

GM of 1800 Balance of Power, Join it Here > viewforum.php?f=309
Victor Auguste de Guéret in Huojin's Louisiana 1792: Fils de la Révolution
Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics in Moo's Balance of Power: 1968

User avatar
Snacks
rhetorical masturbation
Posts: 407
Joined: 21:22:18 Wednesday, 22 August, 2012

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Snacks » 23:02:42 Friday, 07 April, 2017

Please continue

User avatar
Coin
Mise, Pangur Bán agus PILOT WHALES
Posts: 1372
Joined: 14:15:01 Thursday, 02 August, 2012

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Coin » 13:57:40 Tuesday, 11 April, 2017

I would prefer the game continue - though as I'm a very minor character, not sure how much weight my own position carries. I've enjoyed it, despite being a bit of a sideshow to the bigger issues.

User avatar
Luc
Romanov of Stats
Posts: 354
Joined: 10:37:42 Thursday, 11 August, 2016
Location: A meridie in regione Aequatoris

Re: OOC: To be or not to be?

Post by Luc » 12:46:33 Thursday, 13 April, 2017

So what do you say Huo? Are you willing to continue with LouLou?
"I am to BOP stats, what Nicholas II was to Russia." - El Luc

GM of 1800 Balance of Power, Join it Here > viewforum.php?f=309
Victor Auguste de Guéret in Huojin's Louisiana 1792: Fils de la Révolution
Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics in Moo's Balance of Power: 1968

Post Reply

Return to “Louisiana 1792: Fils de la Révolution”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest