UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Discussion of and voting on pressing world matters.
Post Reply
User avatar
Serenissima
England Expects Every Man Will Do His Duty
Posts: 1165
Joined: 23:49:08 Wednesday, 17 April, 2013
Location: United Kingdom

UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Serenissima » 00:13:13 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Image
We are shocked by the events that have taken place without a Security Council resolution authorising any action, and deplore any continuation of violence by either side. Japan calls for an emergency Security Council resolution that would implement an immediate, mandatory and mutual ceasefire in this conflict, in order to create a more stable situation that will allow for diplomatic discussions and a peaceful resolution. While we are aware of the concerns surrounding Iranian nuclear ambitions, as well as the outrage that is surely being felt in Iran due to the attack on nuclear facilities in their territory, Japan does not believe violence will solve anything - and indeed, will only further the problems in the Middle East.
"Imagine lies, and then write them down in order. That is literally all authors do!"

Serenissima's WW2 BoP: The GM (obviously)
Metal Gear BoP: Japan
1971: Israel
Dawn of Worlds: Aaru, the Soulguide
Kaiserreich BoP: Canada

User avatar
scorpion
Revolutionary
Revolutionary
Posts: 1466
Joined: 19:43:14 Friday, 03 August, 2012

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by scorpion » 02:21:32 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Image
India too is shocked by the conflict between France and Iran. What is the reasoning behind France's attack on Iran? I am not naive and am aware of the speculation regarding Iranian nuclear weapons, but at this point I have not seen any proof put forward to be addressed by this security council from France, or any nation.

-Pratibha Patil, President of India
Image
Metal Gear BoP-GM
1936 BoP-Nazi Germany
1971 BoP-France
Klash of Kings-King Stannis Baratheon

User avatar
Red John
Stalinist
Stalinist
Posts: 294
Joined: 04:21:08 Sunday, 31 July, 2016

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Red John » 12:40:29 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Image
China, too, would like to know why France has decided to arbitrarily launch a sneak-attack against alleged Iranian nuclear weapon production facilities. As a member of the UNSC, such a blatant disregard for the UN and UNSC is unbelievable. Not only has France tarnished it's image by launching an unprovoked attack, it has also jeopardized current operations in Afghanistan by using Afghanistan as a launching pad for these attacks.

We support a mandatory ceasefire.

User avatar
Flaming Bolshevik
Revisionist
Revisionist
Posts: 228
Joined: 19:52:45 Saturday, 15 July, 2017

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Flaming Bolshevik » 17:04:40 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Regardless of why these French pigs have chosen to attack, some form of compensation must be paid to Iran for the damages done in such a vile and backstabbing violation of sovereignty.
Metal Gear BOP: Syria
Aliens!: Romania
BOP 1800: Saint Domingue
BOP 1990: Netherlands
Brazil: Intergralists
BOP 1971: DPRK
BOP 1936: Nationalist Spain

MTFD
Anarcho-Communist
Anarcho-Communist
Posts: 73
Joined: 23:45:21 Monday, 05 September, 2016

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by MTFD » 17:27:52 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

As far as the French government is concerned, the matter is done. Our objectives were completed. Our intelligence agencies were made aware that Iran successfully constructed a nuclear weapon. Furthermore, the movements of these weapons gave us reason to believe French forces and their allies in the middle east were under threat.

Unfortunately, this forced our hand. We sincerely regret the loss of life. Only targets relevant to the nuclear program were struck. We seek no further action against Iran. Should Iran retaliate, however, we will not be afraid to do everything we can to protect France and her allies.

We will support the resolution for a ceasefire in the UNSC.

User avatar
Flaming Bolshevik
Revisionist
Revisionist
Posts: 228
Joined: 19:52:45 Saturday, 15 July, 2017

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Flaming Bolshevik » 19:02:07 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

MTFD wrote:
17:27:52 Sunday, 03 December, 2017
As far as the French government is concerned, the matter is done. Our objectives were completed. Our intelligence agencies were made aware that Iran successfully constructed a nuclear weapon. Furthermore, the movements of these weapons gave us reason to believe French forces and their allies in the middle east were under threat.

Unfortunately, this forced our hand. We sincerely regret the loss of life. Only targets relevant to the nuclear program were struck. We seek no further action against Iran. Should Iran retaliate, however, we will not be afraid to do everything we can to protect France and her allies.

We will support the resolution for a ceasefire in the UNSC.
You think you can cause so much death and destruction in Iran and expect no retaliation? The cowardice shown from the French is absolutely astonishing. There must absolutely be some punishment for such warmongering actions by the UN.
Metal Gear BOP: Syria
Aliens!: Romania
BOP 1800: Saint Domingue
BOP 1990: Netherlands
Brazil: Intergralists
BOP 1971: DPRK
BOP 1936: Nationalist Spain

MTFD
Anarcho-Communist
Anarcho-Communist
Posts: 73
Joined: 23:45:21 Monday, 05 September, 2016

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by MTFD » 19:45:57 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

There was a limited precision strike in response to an imminent threat. As stated before, we support the resolution for a ceasefire.

User avatar
Master of Oblivion
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 740
Joined: 02:29:10 Tuesday, 07 August, 2012

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Master of Oblivion » 20:58:25 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Iran has railed constantly against the hypocrisy of the United Nations and the West. The United Nations did nothing when an illegal regime invaded Iraq, claiming it had no troops for a peacekeeping operation. Yet the UN had enough soldiers to engage in the slaughter of Shia in South Lebanon. Now the French hide behind a "limited precision strike". The oppressed peoples of Asia and Africa are well versed in the terminology used to justify French Imperialism. Just like their previous endeavors in Vietnam and Algeria, this effort will fail too.

French Imperialism has also undermined the sovereignty of the Afghan state. We doubt that our friends in Afghanistan approved of their country being used as a base of operations for attacks. We call upon NATO leadership and the Afghan government to condemn French strikes based out of Afghanistan or we will assume they are complicit in the operations.

The Islamic Republic of Iran demands that France withdraw its forces from Persian Gulf and any territories bordering Iran and Syria. Secondly we demand a compensation of 350 credits for the loss of life suffered in Iran. Finally, Iran will be proceeding with war crimes trials against captured French pilots. Islamic justice will be served.
1990: Israel
Metal Gear: Iran
New Vegas: Salvador
Brazil: Proletarian Unification Party
1936: Empire of Japan
1971: China
Kaiserreich: CSA
You either die Fo'Dolo or see yourself live long enough to be the Patton.

User avatar
scorpion
Revolutionary
Revolutionary
Posts: 1466
Joined: 19:43:14 Friday, 03 August, 2012

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by scorpion » 21:07:17 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Image
Afghanistan sees Iran as a friend and neighbor. I did not authorize the use of airfields in Afghanistan to be used in strikes on Iran. The French acted on their own volition, and to my knowledge, other NATO members were not aware of French directives in Iran. Therefore I condemn the French attacks that used Afghan airfields and request that the French military leave Afghanistan.

-Hamid Karzai, President of Afghanistan.
Image
Metal Gear BoP-GM
1936 BoP-Nazi Germany
1971 BoP-France
Klash of Kings-King Stannis Baratheon

MTFD
Anarcho-Communist
Anarcho-Communist
Posts: 73
Joined: 23:45:21 Monday, 05 September, 2016

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by MTFD » 21:20:45 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

The Iranian ramblings are laughable, it is clear from their statement that they knew exactly what they were doing and that we were well justified in our limited precision strike.
Master of Oblivion wrote:
20:58:25 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

The Islamic Republic of Iran demands that France withdraw its forces from Persian Gulf and any territories bordering Iran and Syria. Secondly we demand a compensation of 350 credits for the loss of life suffered in Iran. Finally, Iran will be proceeding with war crimes trials against captured French pilots. Islamic justice will be served.
We support the UN ceasefire, nothing more and nothing less.

Cephal
The Commandant
Posts: 182
Joined: 22:26:56 Friday, 03 August, 2012

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Cephal » 21:24:01 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

Neither The United States Government nor NATO Operational Command were informed prior to the French strike on Iran and the launch of French strike craft from a NATO base in Afghanistan. This was not a move indicated as part of wider NATO strategy in the Middle East on behalf of the US led coalition and therefore was not approved by our organization.

This breach of conduct by a member of the coalition in Afganistan is regrettable and therefore we will have our French allies leave the coalition in Afghanistan as well as Iraq to alleviate global concerns.

We thank the French for their participation and look forward to working with them on operations in other global matters as a close and longtime ally of France.

-President James Johnson
Last edited by Cephal on 21:31:15 Sunday, 03 December, 2017, edited 1 time in total.
France BoP 1968

MTFD
Anarcho-Communist
Anarcho-Communist
Posts: 73
Joined: 23:45:21 Monday, 05 September, 2016

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by MTFD » 21:27:04 Sunday, 03 December, 2017

scorpion wrote:
21:07:17 Sunday, 03 December, 2017
Image
Afghanistan sees Iran as a friend and neighbor. I did not authorize the use of airfields in Afghanistan to be used in strikes on Iran. The French acted on their own volition, and to my knowledge, other NATO members were not aware of French directives in Iran. Therefore I condemn the French attacks that used Afghan airfields and request that the French military leave Afghanistan.

-Hamid Karzai, President of Afghanistan.
Our most sincere apologies, the intelligence we received was of such an urgent nature that we saw no other option. Because of the urgent nature, we indeed did not inform other NATO forces in Afghanistan.

User avatar
Master of Oblivion
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 740
Joined: 02:29:10 Tuesday, 07 August, 2012

Re: UNSC: Franco-Iranian Conflict

Post by Master of Oblivion » 02:48:43 Friday, 08 December, 2017

Typical western cowardice: Launching an airstrike and then clamoring for a ceasefire. How many pilots did you lose? Do you think a ceasefire will protect you from the muslim faithful that will seek justice across the globe?
1990: Israel
Metal Gear: Iran
New Vegas: Salvador
Brazil: Proletarian Unification Party
1936: Empire of Japan
1971: China
Kaiserreich: CSA
You either die Fo'Dolo or see yourself live long enough to be the Patton.

Post Reply

Return to “The United Nations”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest